Letters to the Editor
(Aust Prescr 1996;19:36-8)
Letters, which may not necessarily be published in full, should be restricted to not more than 250 words. When relevant, comment on the letter is sought from the author. Due to production schedules, it is normally not possible to publish letters received in response to material appearing in a particular issue earlier than the second or third subsequent issue.
Oral complications of cytotoxic therapy
Editor, - In his table, Dr A. Bonaventura outlines various therapies for oral complications of cytotoxic therapy ('Dental implications' Aust Prescr 1995;18:68). In my experience, his recommended remedies, at best, give minimal, short -term pain relief and, at worst, suppress the immune system.
I would like to suggest he try a herbal extract called Oralmat Drops, available over-the-counter at pharmacies, with which I have observed remarkable efficacy in all of the conditions he mentions. Pain relief is, in many cases, almost instantaneous following application of the drops. Healing of lesions is facilitated while antibiotics, antivirals and antifungals are rarely necessary. This suggests to me the likelihood of immunomodulatory activity by the extract which, because of its potential importance in medicine generally, calls for closer scrutiny.
C.L. Reynolds General Practitioner South Yarra, Vic.
Dr A. Bonaventura, the author of the article, comments:
Oralmat is a herbal extract from secale cereale (rye) manufactured by Ensign
Laboratories for Schumacher Pharmaceuticals in Melbourne. It is available in
a solution or cream over-the-counter.
Dr Reynolds has sent me his personal observations on the efficacy of this
extract in various clinical settings. No clinical trial has been done comparing
this extract to placebo or other standard approaches. Based on these observations,
it may be worthwhile pursuing further.
Editor, - In the interest of semantic accuracy, I do not believe the answer to question 12 in the self-test questions is correct in 'Complications of cytotoxic therapy - part 2' (Aust Prescr 1995;18:105-7).
The cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin is not increased in patients having concomitant radiotherapy to the chest unless that radiation therapy includes the heart in the treatment volume. It is the radiation of the heart per se, not irradiation of the chest, which is dangerous.
A.O. Langlands Division of Radiation Oncology Westmead Hospital Westmead, N.S.W.
Dr A. Bonaventura, the author of the article, comments:
Professor Langlands' semantics are correct. Irradiation of major portions
of the heart pot entiates the development of adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy.
This can occur during treatment of patients with carcinoma of the lung, oesophagus,
mediastinal tumours, breast cancer and lymphomas. The combined effects (synergistic)
of radiation and adriamycin on the heart result in injury to different target
cells (radiation damages the microvasculature and adriamycin the myocytes).
Potential ways of reducing chemoradiation cardiotoxicity include
Editor, - The crossing of the leg on the letter R (of recipe) comes from the pagan diagonal cross, which was then an invocation to the God Jove for good fortune.
The action of forming the cross was adapted by the early Christian Church for both public and personal ceremonial. The personal form has also passed down to us in the form of crossing fingers for good luck - and as a talisman against evil spirits.
For the early physicians with phytomedicinals of doubtful value, crossing the R on their prescriptions was all too often a genuine and heartfelt request for good fortune.
Peter J. Mack Dental Surgeon Perth, W.A.
Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Editor, - Dr P. Hazell (Aust Prescr 1995;18:60-3) and Professor R. Adler (Aust Prescr 1995;18:64), writing on stimulant treatment for ADHD, demonstrate the 'medical model' approach to the problem.
Further consideration of the DSM-IV Dr Hazell refers to, may enable one to determine some common characteristics of personality amongst the parents in these cases. This then becomes a delicate matter. Having brought their child for treatment to various medical specialists authorised to prescribe methylphenidate and amphetamines for ADHD, parents may not take kindly to any suggestion that the origins of the problem of the child are rooted in their personalities and that the child's best chance of staying out of gaol as an adult, or being killed or seriously injured in a motor accident, or becoming psychotic, lies in the parents entering therapy as well.
This is hardly a popular concept and an even less popular option. It can be applicable for a myriad of 'medical' problems, with not only parents, but also often medical practitioners, loathe to consult appropriately trained psychologists. Whilst, as Dr Hazell says, there is evidence of brain injury in some cases, remember ADHD was also known as 'minimal brain dysfunction' before the euphemism 'ADHD' was invented to make parents and child and others more comfortable with the diagnosis.
The realistic possibility of schizophrenia in early adulthood is better faced at the outset. Whilst I see no value in causing patients or their relatives undue concern, they might better appreciate some indication of what the future might hold.
Karl R. Wood Pharmacist and Member Psychologists' Association of Australia Cabramatta, N.S.W.
Dr P. Hazell, the author of the article, comments:
Mr Wood has raised concern about schizophrenia being overlooked as a
differential diagnosis in ADHD, and the possibility that the child's problems
may be due to other problems in the family. While there are individual case
reports of children diagnosed with ADHD developing schizophrenia1,
and some retrospective evidence that adults with schizophrenia may have childhood
histories of attentional problems2, longitudinal research
has found ADHD children to be no more likely than control subjects to develop
schizophrenia in adulthood.3 Since the possibility of
schizophrenia is remote in most ADHD children, I would not recommend that
clinicians raise with parents schizophrenia as a potential outcome. Conduct,
emotional and educational difficulties are of greater concern.3
Family difficulties must be considered in the assessment and management of ADHD children4; however, it is unlikely that these problems cause ADHD. Parent psychopathology, including personality disturbance, seems to be of greater relevance to the development of conduct problems than to ADHD.5 Any association of ADHD with parent psychopathology is almost certainly due to the common co-occurrence of ADHD with conduct problems. ADHD children may be more vulnerable than their non-affected siblings to the pathogenic effects of living with a disturbed parent.
R E F E R E N C E S
1. Schmidt K, Freidson S. Atypical outcome in attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1990;29:566-70.
2. Erlenmeyer-Kimling L, Cornblatt BA, Rock D, Roberts
S, Bell M, West A. The New York High-Risk Project: anhedonia, attentional
deviance, and psychopathology. Schizophr Bull 1993;19:141-53.
3. Weiss G, Hechtman L, Milroy T, Perlman T. Psychiatric
status of hyperactives as adults: a controlled prospective 15-year follow-up
of 63 hyperactive children. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1985;24:211 -20.
4. Hazell P. Stimulant treatment for attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder. Aust Prescr 1995;18:60-3.
5. Lahey BB, Russo MF, Walker JL, Piacentini JC. Personality
characteristics of the mothers of children with disruptive behavior disorders.
J Consult Clin Psychol 1989;57:512-5.
Editor, - I refer to the articles by Professor J. Tiller (Aust Prescr 1995;18:92-6) and Professor G. Shenfield (Aust Prescr 1995;18:100-1) on the new antidepressants. The new drugs are being compared with tricyclics (TCAs) in a way which one can only describe as disingenuously simplistic. The tricyclics are a heterogeneous group and vary greatly in their binding affinity at various receptors. For instance, desipramine is 1000-fold more potent, as a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, than trimipramine. Also plasma levels of TCAs vary greatly. Thus, comparing all 'TCAs' with SSRIs is misleading. Comparing therapeutic levels of desipramine and nortriptyline would be more appropriate.
The statement by Professor Shenfield regarding MAOIs that 'numerous serious interactions with a range of other drugs including TCAs.....' requires putting into perspective. Despite treating about 1000 patients with MAOIs in my career, I have rarely seen even minor morbidity from hypertensive reactions, which are easily treatable. I have managed many thousand 'patient years' of combinations (of MAOIs with TCAs) and never seen problems (one avoids clomipramine and imipramine which have clinically significant serotonin reuptake inhibition capacity).
In contrast, I have seen quite a few serious serotonin syndrome reactions already and a computer search shows a rapid increase in reports from 8 in 1992, to 16 in 1994, and 12 in the first 7 months of 1995. There is no effective treatment for this potentially fatal interaction; bathroom cupboards everywhere now contain both moclobemide and SSRIs; individually very safe, when combined, potentially fatal.
P.K. Gillman Psychiatrist Mount Pleasant, Qld
Professor G. Shenfield, the author of the article on the use of moclobemide
with other antidepressants, comments:
I am grateful to Dr Gillman for his comments which support my suggestion
that moclobemide may have serious interactions with the SSRIs. My statement
on the potential for dangerous interactions between classical MAOIs and tricyclic
antidepressants was based on extensive literature and is clearly endorsed
by the product information for the drugs in question.
All prescribing must maintain a balance between efficacy and safety. In the case of combination antidepressants, there is no objective evidence of benefit and good evidence of potential for harm. The purpose of my article was to suggest that moclobemide, although both a selective and reversible MAOI, is not necessarily safe in combination with other antidepressants. Dr Gillman appears to agree with me!
Associate Professor J.W.G. Tiller, the author of the article on the new
antidepressants, comments:
There is extensive data on TCA-MAOI interactions which can be serious
and fatal. Data on increased efficacy (if any) with drug combinations are,
in contrast, scant. Such data usually do not compare the use of one or the
other drug, in higher dosage, with the combination. Moclobemide is a reversible
selective inhibitor of MAO-A with a short half -life, and clinically quite
different to traditional MAOIs. Combination antidepressant treatment with
moclobemide is not recommended but research data suggest that it may be used
with other antidepressants in low dosage. This would normally be in the context
of changing from one antidepressant to another as the former drug is washed
out. Moclobemide and clomipramine co-prescribing is contraindicated.
The advent of a wide range of new drugs and a better understanding of augmentation strategies with lithium and anticonvulsants has, for practical purposes, almost totally eliminated the need for combination antidepressant therapy.